Current owner information changes the context
Mometu’s present homepage describes a service championing independent filmmakers, international cinema, underserved voices and classics. It then frames a future relaunch as conditional on support. That statement is important context for a service directory: an older claim of always-available free viewing should not be repeated as a current operational guarantee.
The proposed model is not an active offer here
The homepage discusses free ad-supported viewing alongside proposed low-cost ad-free and supporter tiers for Mometu 2.0. These are plans described in a funding appeal. They do not establish a present checkout, confirmed launch date, final price or available membership feature. This guide therefore does not invite readers to buy an unverified new tier.
Older app descriptions remain historical evidence
The retrieved publisher store listings still describe no subscription or credit-card requirement and a curated film selection. Those establish the identity and earlier proposition, but do not resolve the later homepage’s status warning. The coexistence of a listing and an appeal should be reported rather than choosing the more attractive promise.
Recheck before making a viewing plan
For a specific film, return to the official service and inspect current availability before relying on it for an evening or recommending a device purchase. A working historical link, old review or saved watchlist cannot establish a completed relaunch. This is a dated editorial status guide, with no account playback test or promise about future operation.
Questions, answered
Has Mometu 2.0 definitely launched?
The retrieved current homepage describes a conditional relaunch appeal, not a completed launch.
Should proposed future tiers be listed as active paid offers?
No. A funding plan is not evidence of a current membership checkout or final feature set.